Relative vs absolute dating for kids lesbian teen dating advice
Medieval and patristic interpreters used the term ‘literal’ to mean the grammatical-historical meaning, which could include a figurative meaning One example is allegorizing the Song of Solomon as referring primarily to Christ and the Church, whereas the text itself is romantic love poetry between Solomon and Shulamit (the Hebrew feminine form of Solomon, i.e. Thou shalt understand, therefore, that the scripture hath but one sense, which is but the literal sense.And that literal sense is the root and ground of all, and the anchor that never faileth, whereunto if thou cleave, thou canst never err or go out of the way.
) Thus it is no surprise that he endorses the error-prone big-bang-adoring progressive creationist Hugh Ross as “evangelicalism’s most important scientific apologist. I enthusiastically support his work.” However, this was in an article where Craig sharply criticizes Ross for his heterodox view of the Triune Godhead and Christ as both fully human and fully God, arguing that Ross borders on the kenotic heresy (see The Kenotic Heresy and Genesis compromise).
For much of his long apologetics career, his aversion to the biblical timescale has merely been implicit—logically entailed by his embrace of long-age ideas.
by Jonathan Sarfati William Lane Craig (1949– ) is a well-known Christian apologist, with earned doctorates in both philosophy and New Testament studies. Craig is a skilled debater, an encyclopedia of facts and quotes, and a careful rhetorician.
He has written over 30 books, and is a very skilled debater, with one atheist admitting: As far as I can tell, he has won nearly all his debates with atheists. I’m not the only one who thinks Craig has won nearly all his debates. If you make a logical mistake, Craig knows exactly how to skewer you for it (and for this, I respect him). This is especially embarrassing for atheists because Craig’s arguments and debates are easily available, and he uses the same arguments all the time.
JS: Since Craig asserts that this is ‘very typically’ the view of YECs, he should have had no trouble in producing one example of this.